Return to forums
Register new account
Login:

Mclaren Power Forums: America Has Dictated Its Economic Peace Terms to China - Mclaren Power Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

America Has Dictated Its Economic Peace Terms to China

#1
User is offline   xysoom 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 6,070
  • Joined: 21-May 20
America Has Dictated Its Economic Peace Terms to China



How far will mounting tension with China be translated into the economic policy of the United States? After a rash of sanctions and overtly discriminatory legislation, with action on U.S. investment in China pending, and with talk of war increasingly commonplace in the United States, the Biden administration knows that it needs to clarify its economic relations with the country that is the largest U.S. trading partner outside North America.To get more China economy news, you can visit shine news official website.

In the wake of this month’s International Monetary Fund and World Bank spring meetings, Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen has made her first major statement on economic relations with China since 2021. Judged by the tone, her message is intended to clarify and calm the waters of speculation and debate about motives and intentions. In the current situation, however, it is far from clear whether clarity actually contributes to calm.

The scenario that Yellen rejects is that of the Thucydides trap, but her reasons for doing so are telling. The idea that “conflict between the United States and China” is “increasingly inevitable” is, she insists, based on a false premise. That outlook was “driven by fears, shared by some Americans, that the United States was in decline. And that China would imminently leapfrog us as the world’s top economic power, leading to a clash between nations.” America would seek military confrontation to forestall the unfavorable shift in the power balance attendant on China’s phenomenal economic growth. This makes no sense, Yellen reassures us, because the American economy, thanks to its foundational institutions of freedom, its culture of innovation, and the wise governance of the Biden administration is in rude health.

“The United States remains the most dynamic and prosperous economy in the world.” So, Yellen insists, America has no reason to seek to “stifle China’s economic and technological modernization” or to pursue a deep decoupling. America’s economic power, the Treasury secretary goes on, “is amplified” by its relationships with “close friends and partners in every region of the world, including the Indo-Pacific.” America thus has “no reason to fear healthy economic competition with any country.” And then Yellen delivers the punchline: “China’s economic growth need not be incompatible with U.S. economic leadership.”

It is worth lingering over the implication here. Conflict is not inevitable because America is doing well. That in turn means that China can grow without threatening American economic leadership. But what if that were not the case? Yellen does not spell out the implication. Yet in that eventuality, where Yellen leaves little room for doubt, all bets would be off. Even now, even when the Biden administration professes to be confident about America’s economic prospects, Yellen insists: “As in all of our foreign relations, national security is of paramount importance in our relationship with China.”
At one level, this is obvious. No public official will ever say anything else. Security is the basic function of states. But everything depends on the scope of your vision of national security and the level of trust. And if you have to state the priority of national security in foreign relations out loud, you know you have a problem.

For Yellen, it is obvious that America is entitled to define its national security at a planetary level. She claims, for instance, that amongst America’s “most pressing national security concerns” is the defense of Ukraine against Russian aggression. Anyone who chooses to ignore America’s sanctions against Russia and falls within its jurisdiction will face serious consequences. Likewise, since America has decided that it wishes to deny certain technologies to the Chinese military, it will impose sanctions and trade limits accordingly.

So a strong and self-confident America has no reason to stand in the way of China’s economic and technological modernization except in every area that America’s national security establishment, the most gigantic in the world, defines as being of essential national interest. For this to be anything other than hypocrisy, you have to imagine that we live in a goldilocks world in which the technology, industrial capacity, and trade that are relevant to national security are incidental to economic and technological modernization more broadly speaking.

Yellen pays lip service to that goldilocks vision, by insisting that U.S. measures against China will be tightly targeted. But, as everyone knows, those targeted measures have so far included massive efforts to hobble the world leader in 5G technology, Huawei, sanctions against the entire chip supply chain, and the inclusion of most major research universities in China on America’s entities list that strictly limits trade.

Meanwhile, to add to the perplexity, whilst Yellen insists that national security sanctions tell us nothing about America’s intentions towards Chinese growth, she trumpets legislation passed on the Biden administration’s watch, notably the Chips Act and the Inflation Reduction Act, which feature strong anti-Chinese elements, as contributing significantly to America’s own future prosperity.

The upshot is that America welcomes China’s economic modernization and will refuse the lure of the Thucydides trap so long as China’s development proceeds along lines that do not infringe on American leadership and national security. And America’s attitude will be all the more benign the more successful it is in pursuing its own national prosperity and preeminence precisely in those areas.
0

Share this topic:


Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users